How we look

In media, the same word can mean a very different number.

Our method starts where definitions differ - because inside that gap, budgets quietly leak. And it rests on one principle throughout: every number we report leads back to a source line. A page, a clause, an invoice. Facts you can check, not opinions you must trust.

Step zero - definitions

Before we compare anything, we fix what the words mean. Per market, per medium.

Two checks before any analysis: is everything there - what's missing is a finding in itself - and does everything mean what it should? Six examples of where the second check earns its keep:

DEF–001Television Is a rating point averaged over the minute, the quarter-hour or the hour? An hourly average claims viewers who were never there for your ad.
DEF–002Online video Is a "view" two seconds of muted autoplay - or an ad actually watched? Every platform counts its own way.
DEF–003Display Is "viewable" half the pixels for two seconds - or genuinely seen? Served is not seen.
DEF–004Out-of-home Is a contact everyone passing the site - or everyone who could see the ad? The contract decides which you pay for.
DEF–005Print & radio Circulation or readership - and how many readers per copy? One assumed multiplier can double "reach" without a single extra reader.
DEF–006The price itself Gross, net or net-net - and which fees live inside the CPM? The same CPM can differ twenty percent depending on what's packed inside.

A reach figure without a stated period, a metric without a definition - that's not data. That's a finding.

Trust, but verify.

Every report we touch - theirs or ours - must survive the same three tests.

Check 1 · Sum

Does it add up?

Every distribution must account for the whole audience, the whole budget, the whole period. If the parts don't sum to the total, something is hiding in the gap.

Check 2 · Consistency

Does the text match the data?

Every stated figure must equal what the underlying data shows - same definition, same window, same baseline. A number that sounds better than it measures is a red flag, not a rounding issue.

Check 3 · Reconciliation

Does the volume match the money?

Contacts, GRPs and impressions must reconcile with what was actually paid. A plan that quietly implies more - or less - spend than the budget is a plan with a window open somewhere.

We hold our own work to these tests first - and before a finding reaches you, your agency gets to respond: correct the facts, add the context. An auditor who can't be audited, and a finding that never heard the other side, are both just another black box.

No media religion

Frequency or recency? We measure your strategy - we don't preach one.

The classic school · after Naples

Effective frequency

Advertising works within a contact zone - too few contacts are invisible, too many are waste. Plan bursts, measure working reach at the effective frequency for your category.

The reach-first school · after Ephron & Sharp

Recency & continuous 1+ reach

One contact close to the purchase moment beats repetition. Plan for continuous presence, measure reach per purchase cycle - week after week.

Both schools agree on one thing: the waste lives in the tails. Our only religion is independence - never a media theory. The yardstick is set per client, and we hold your agency to your strategy.

Honest numbers

We speak in probabilities - and we keep score on ourselves.

A forecast is a professional estimate, not a guarantee, and we put that in writing. We agree the yardstick up front and record every prediction next to its outcome.

And one rule above all the machinery: never let the agency's AI prove the agency's work. Ours looks outward - at the market and the agency - never inward into your systems. And it answers to the same three checks as everyone else.

See it applied

The method in action, on your own media: the mileage scan.

Request the mileage scan